World Media Complicit in US Propoganda?

Are the writers of The Guardian as naive as Bush's 51%, or is it something more sinister?

Guardian Unlimited | The shape of a second term...: "Now there is no electoral need for restraint. The attack will be bloody (...) That these casualties only fuel Iraqi nationalism, anger with the Americans and a desire for revenge, seems not to be understood in Washington."

Yeah - sure. Washington doesn't recognize cause-and-effect. That's right, we're freakin idiots over here and the capital isn't a thinktank consuming our greatest minds in sociology, economics and of course global domination.

Neither do we, the silly American public recognize that our security is pimped-out time and again, our lives expendible fodder for whatever expensive imperialist endeavor currently wets the chops of our warrior elite. Nope, can't see a thing in front of my face.

Stupid brits! Does a man, even an idiot American, repeatedly shoot himself in the face to scratch his nose?

Is it not obvious that The country has been hijacked and THE CITIZENS ARE ENTIRELY STRAPPED-IN, like some mad carnival ride gone out of control, finally flinging us all to our deaths.

We cannot get off. :(

I had to check my spelling of complicit and the definition I got back was:

Dictionary - Yahoo! Reference: complicit
SYLLABICATION: com�plic�it
ADJECTIVE: Associated with or participating in a questionable act or a crime; having complicity: newspapers complicit with the propaganda arm of a dictatorship.

Yes - how very apt.